data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6811/f6811561d61cf8ac8111e2bdae97fc8fe7d932e8" alt=""
Shadow Kill (Nizhalkkuthu, 2002)
Director: Adoor Gopalakrishnan
Have you ever wondered why the majority of prison wardens in the United States who have participated in executions are against the death penalty? Have you ever thought about why individuals who were about to be executed used to give their executioner a coin? The answer to the first question is that these wardens know that innocent people have been put to death, and they want no part of it. The answer to the second question is that the coin was a token of forgiveness to a person with a morally ambiguous job to do. Veteran Indian director Adoor Gopalakrishnan uses parallel stories to show the tragedy that is capital punishment.
The year is 1941, a time of social foment in India. Kaliyappan (Oduvil Unnikrishnan) is a hangman in Travancore (now part of the state of Kerala) at the southern tip of India. His willingness to do this distasteful job has afforded him many privileges from the Maharajah, including a house and fields to tend. Nonetheless, he carries a heavy burden. He has learned that one of the people he hanged was innocent. The guilt has driven him to heavy drinking. It has driven his son Muthu (Sunil) to seek guidance from the teachings of Mohandas Gandhi.
The scene switches to a classroom of girls. A trickle of blood runs down one girl's leg, and she starts to cry. The girl, Mallika (Reeja), has just begun her very first menstrual cycle. Later, at her home, many people are gathered to perform the rituals welcoming her into womanhood. Mallika is delighted with the attention and the new regard people show for her. After a glancing look between her and her brother-in-law, we return to Kaliyappan's story.
On the road, an official finds himself stuck on the wrong side of a creek. Two villagers who encounter him inform him that he can wade across. The official, smartly dressed in a white uniform, curls his lip with distaste. The villagers end up carrying him across the creek and then inform him once they learn he is looking for Kaliyappan that he could have made the approach using the road. This interlude imitates the comedic moments found in Shakespearean tragedies.
Upon reaching Kaliyappan's home, the official reads the decree that a new execution has been ordered. Kaliyappan is beside himself with grief, and complains that he is unwell. The official is unsympathetic. One simply does not postpone a hanging. The reason was made clear by the gossiping villagers who carried the official across the creek--the Maharajah absolves himself of guilt over the hanging by sending a full and complete pardon that is timed to reach the jail after the execution takes place!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/149f1/149f15a9df1e214f30ad547ff05d9fd2b787e6f2" alt=""
Once again, Kaliyappan tries to beg off due to illness. He does indeed look extremely ill. The official insists that he go, and that Muthu accompany him. A rueful look passes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7081b/7081ba212ed267208b426407c5fe47f19692ee0d" alt=""
Gopalakrishnan takes his time setting the stage for this drama. Kaliyappan, his family, his habits, and his surroundings are lovingly captured to help us empathize with a man we might have dismissed as a repugnant drunk who exchanges state-sanctioned murder for material comfort. Every frame is like a painting, emphasizing the beauty and timelessness of this lush, tropical land and contrasting it with the dark environments of the people who inhabit it. In this way, Gopalakrishnan brings the spirit of Kali to life for us visually.
But he doesn't refrain from shining a light on the very real social problem of capital punishment. The cynicism of the Maharajah, the careerism of the official who will not lose his job over a postponed execution, the soul-destroying toll it takes on the hangman, and the miscarriages of justice are all in plain view. Setting the film in 1941 has a slight distancing effect, however, and initiating Muthu forcibly into state-sanctioned slaughter seems heavyhanded, though plausible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08787/08787ee2e7384ea4445bf4a4d64a71c04eba647b" alt=""
I have two other reviews on this site that deal with capital punishment. Deadline is a documentary about the death penalty, and Chicago features the hanging of an innocent woman convicted of killing her husband primarily because she was poor and couldn't speak English. Joining them, Shadow Kill is a very fine fiction about this timely and troubling topic from a land exotic and beautiful, dark and familiar. l
This film is part of the Global Lens Collection of the Global Film Initiative, whose mission is to promote cross-cultural understanding through film. The 2006 Global Lens series schedule of theatrical showings in the United States can be found at http://www.globalfilm.org/calendar.htm. One of the films in the series, Border Cafe, played at the Chicago International Film Festival in 2005, and it was the best film I saw that year. Don't miss it.
4 Comments:
At 5:44 PM,
Mark said…
I am against capital punishment for two reasons. 1) Our justice system is not perfect. 2) Capital punishment seems barbarous. Having said this, I am not sure how I would react to the murder of a loved one or something even worse. Some other good movies that deal with capital punishment are "A Short Film About Killing" from Krzysztof Kieslowski's "Decalogue" and "Dancer in the Dark" by Lars Von Trier. Is "Shadow Kill" out on DVD?
-Mark
www.moviemasterworks.com
At 8:32 PM,
Marilyn said…
Yes, Mark, it is. If you intend to go to the Cinema/Chicago presentations at the Landmark (see link at end of review), I'll loan you my copy.
At 9:40 AM,
Mark said…
I'll check the Landmark out. My brother has a Netflix account and I'll just ask him to add Shadow Kill to the list. I need to get Red Beard as well .
At 10:02 AM,
Rajesh said…
Marylin, I must admit that I was a bit surprised to see your apparent understanding of the nuances of a subculture that one would expect from a native writer on Adoor's films. Thanks for the review. This is one movie of his that I haven't seen yet. Cheers.
Post a Comment
<< Home